![]() |
|
|||||||
| Redeemed General A forum for members of Tribe of Judah's Alliance guild on the Stonemaul realm |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mastery Info - Cataclysm
Hey all - doing my daily forum troll while at work, and found this. Granted, they plug it on the main website, so you'd probably have seen it anyway. However, I've included all the blue responses to compile kind of a quick-read Q&A for you guys. Happy reading! P.S. The player questions are in quote boxes, with the Blue responses below them.
Last week, we gave you an early look at the changes we’re making to the stat system in World of Warcraft: Cataclysm, and explained how these changes will ultimately provide players with more interesting gear choices and make stats easier to understand. Today we’d like to go into more detail about a brand-new feature that’s an integral part of this overhaul: the Mastery system, a set of new game mechanics designed to allow players to become better at what makes their chosen talent tree cool or unique. With this system, we want to accomplish three things: give players more freedom in how they allocate talent points, simplify some of the “kitchen sinky” talents that try to do too much at once, and add a new stat to high-level gear that makes you better at your chosen role. Here’s how the system works: As you spend points in a given talent tree, you’ll receive three different passive bonuses specific to that tree. The first bonus will increase your damage, healing, or survivability, depending on the intended role of the tree. The second bonus will be related to a stat commonly found on gear desirable to you, such as Haste or Crit. The third bonus will be the most interesting, as it will provide an effect completely unique to that tree -- meaning there will be 30 different bonuses of this nature in the game. This third bonus is the one that will benefit from the Mastery rating found on high-level (level 80 to 85) gear. One of our primary goals with Mastery is to give players more flexibility to choose fun or utility-oriented talents rather than make them feel obligated to pick up “mandatory” but uninteresting talents, such as passive damage or healing. (For examples of the kinds of powerful but boring talents we’re talking about, take a look at the talent tier just above the 51-point talent in many of the existing trees.) In a sense, Mastery makes it so every talent in (just for example) a rogue tree essentially has an invisible additional bullet point that says “…and increases your damage by X%.” This way, if you choose a talent like Elusiveness (which reduces your chance to be detected while stealthed) or Fleet Footed (which affects movement), you won’t feel like you’re giving up damage in exchange for utility. There will still be talents that boost damage, of course, but those talents will also affect the way you play. For example, you can still expect to see talents like Improved Frostbolt, which reduces the cast time of the Frostbolt spell; it increases DPS, but it also affects the mage’s rotation. Piercing Ice, however, is just “6% more damage” and is the kind of talent we’re trying to eliminate by implementing the Mastery system. As we get closer to Cataclysm’s release, we’ll go into more detail about the changes coming for each class, including individual talent-tree adjustments and how Mastery will affect them. In the meantime, here are a few examples to demonstrate the three kinds of passive bonuses we described above. Please keep in mind that we're still working on this system, and the handful of examples we're providing here are, of course, subject to change. Holy Priest For each talent point spent in the Holy tree, the priest also gets: * Healing – Improves your healing by X%. * Meditation – Improves your mana regeneration from Spirit in combat. This would likely replace the existing Meditation talent from the Discipline tree, which many Holy priests consider to be a “must-have.” Regeneration will also probably be determined by whether you are in or out of combat, and not the “five-second rule. * Radiance – Adds a heal-over-time effect to direct heals, such as Flash Heal. Mastery on gear would boost this bonus, and no other talent tree would grant it. Discipline Priest For each talent point spent in the Discipline tree, the priest also gets: * Healing – Improves your healing by X%. * Meditation – Improves your mana regeneration from Spirit in combat. This would likely replace the existing Meditation talent. * Absorption – Improves the amount of damage absorbed by spells such as Power Word: Shield and Divine Aegis. Mastery on gear would boost this bonus, and no other talent tree would grant it. Frost Death Knight For each talent point spent in the Frost tree, the death knight also gets: * Damage – Improves your melee and spell damage by X%. * Haste – Improves your melee Haste by Y%. This might allow us to remove some of the Haste in the Icy Talons line of talents. * Runic Power – Improves the rate of runic power generated by abilities. While all death knights want runic power, Frost death knights would generally have more runic power than Blood or Unholy death knights (who would receive a different benefit from their respective trees). An Unholy death knight who sub-specs into Frost would still be able to benefit from this bonus, though because they’re investing fewer talent points, they’d benefit to a smaller degree. Mastery on gear would boost this bonus, and no other talent tree would grant it. A couple other things to note: Currently, we’re not planning to retrofit the Mastery stat onto current level-80 gear when we roll out the stat-system changes prior to Cataclysm’s release. However, Mastery will begin appearing on select quest and dungeon items. You will also gain a small amount of Mastery by wearing gear of your intended armor type (such as plate for paladins). For players with dual specs, when you change between your two chosen specs, the Mastery bonuses and the benefit you receive from the Mastery stat on gear will adjust automatically based on your new spec. We’ll have more details to share about these and other changes we’re making in Cataclysm in the future, and we’ll do our best to answer your questions about the Mastery system here on the forums. For information on many of the stat changes being made in Cataclysm, please check out our earlier update at - http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...25636414&sid=1 [ Post edited by Eyonix ]
__________________
Self-Proclaimed Guild Fishing Authority Last edited by Flamethrøwer; March 9th, 2010 at 09:11 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ghostcrawler replies:
It's possible you will only get the benefit of the tree in which you've spent the most points, or will only get the benefit from say 50 points maximum with the bonus chosen from the tree with the most points in it. We'll have to see when the talent trees are more finalized and we start to figure out build strategies. Overall, the goal is to spend points as you want, and not feel penalized for spending into another tree or feel like you have to game things by spending more points than you want in your tree. Remember these passive bonuses are designed to give you flexibility, not lock you into anything.
__________________
Self-Proclaimed Guild Fishing Authority |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The flexibility comes (hopefully) in having more discretionary points that you can spend on talents you like, rather than sacrificing raw damage, healing or tanking to do so.
__________________
Self-Proclaimed Guild Fishing Authority |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's designed partially with new players in mind. It will be much harder to have a truly terrible talent spec because you won't be able to help but be reasonably good at your chosen role. The mastery stat itself won't show up until high level, and even when it does, you should have more confidence that it's a stat you want instead of say trying to figure out the percent of your damage that is physical damage to calculate if armor pen is good for you or not. I admit that adding passive bonuses at all to talent trees complicates the talent feature slightly. We hope to make up for that by there being less paranoia about picking "the wrong" spec. The wrong spec might only be a slight loss instead of a tragic loss. As a point of comparison, dual-spec complicates talents a little, but overall we think it was good for the game.
__________________
Self-Proclaimed Guild Fishing Authority |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
When we begin revealing specific class information, (such as new spells and abilities, and the talent tree revamp) -- the posts we've made thus far, will make much more sense. I feel, players should look at the stat/system changes, as well as this mastery post as a "piece of a puzzle" -- and ask questions, provide feedback, but understand that until more information is released, it's not possible to see the whole of the picture.
__________________
Self-Proclaimed Guild Fishing Authority |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
We have quite a bit of information coming regarding the next expansion, so just hang tight, have faith. I know many players will naturally be skeptical of what I'm about to say... I've never been more excited about this game with what's to come (and I've been playing for over 8-years), than I am now. I cannot wait to share more information with you, and I can't wait for you to experience it first hand. And to be honest, I can't wait for me to experience it first hand!
__________________
Self-Proclaimed Guild Fishing Authority |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Self-Proclaimed Guild Fishing Authority |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Cataclysm info | Flamethrøwer | Redeemed General | 30 | March 9th, 2010 01:40 AM |
| New Cataclysm Trailer | Erimos | Redeemed General | 2 | October 5th, 2009 01:52 PM |
| Cataclysm | Alias | General Chat | 2 | September 11th, 2009 12:49 PM |
| Wow cataclysm | Dradow(MrFuzzy) | Redeemed General | 55 | August 25th, 2009 04:22 PM |
| Black Smithing Mastery | Aarok | Mustard Seed Conspiracy General Discussion | 3 | April 29th, 2007 04:44 PM |