Search results

To use one of your lines: Whatever helps you sleep at night:)

*chuckle* I've addressed this too many times already.

1 Thessalonians 5:21 in context supports my argument DV:) Try again!

LOL...I'm not doing any pushing into ovens and neither is any other Christian. We might warn you about the wrath of God toward sin, but we sure don't have the ability to put you in hell even if we wanted to. You are definitely looking at it from the other side of the fence though. We look...

Fortunately, that works both ways;)

The reason it is a fallacy is this: You don't use the scientific method to argue a philosophy. You don't use philosophy to argue a scientific theory. You don't use faith to argue science. You don't use the scientific method to argue faith. It doesn't make since to do any of those...

DV to say that questioning the scientific process makes us hypocrits is a fallacy. You question our faith and tell us we shouldn't question science? How better to question scientific theories than to point out their scientific problems? It is not hypocritical in the least for us to question...

I didn't notice anyone saying that you believe in macro evolution as the 'be all end all' DV. Where did I miss that? As for macro evolution being more scientific than creationism...gotta disagree with you there. After decades of searching...there is no evidence for macro. So being that...

Quite simply. There is a lot of matter that does not give off light. Special circumstances must be present to change it to light.

I am sorry if my posts offended anyone. I grew up debating my brothers and we were quite ruthless with each other at times. Guess I didn't notice when I crossed the uncivil line. I'll try to do better in the future Gen:)

So let me see if I got this right. IceBladePod should not point out things that evolutionists do that are questionable, because christians in the past have done things that are questionable? Wow thats a very convincing argument... I guess us Christians are second class citizens now...

LOL...not very objective (hey I used one of your words) if you take into consideration that there is absolutely zero, nada, zilch scientific evidence for macro evolution. Intelligent design and Creationism are not scientifically provable I agree. But no scientific evidence exists for macro...

Just to keep things clear for our resident non-christians:) You would agree that all of this is pure speculation on your part correct kraniac? That non of this has any biblical support or is even hinted at in the Bible?

WOW! I'm sorry I asked now:confused:

Some of the skeletons called cave men were probably an extinct ape type creature. Some were just men that they dress up in caveman clothes when they did their artists recreation. Some are very very old men and women from the time when men lived hundreds of years. We have had 'cavemen'...

Personally I think he has become an embarrassment. The little issue in Dover is just a reflection of the American society in general. I don't much care for the intelligent design thing anyway. I'm more for full blown creationism taught straight from the Bible:)

Thanks to all the veterans out there that have helped to keep this country free, so I can continue to mix religion with politics

*Didasko shakes his head and sighs as he moves off to another thread*

I can agree with that definition:)