Search results

It's as clear as spring water:) Even so I think you got the prosecution and the defense backward.

I guess my main request is, please don't make unfounded attacks on specific words in my posts to make them appear less credible. In addition, we are not going to reach agreement in this discussion. I do not accept your argument and you do not accept mine. Lets agree to disagree:)

DV the point I was trying to make is that YOU posted the definition of 'want' that best fit YOUR side of the argument. 2 a : to have a strong desire for <wanted a chance to rest> b : to have an inclination to Was also in the same list of definitions from exactly the same website you...

Where did you get that from? Did you read my whole post?

Nope I refuse to play word games with you:) Not worth discussing with you if your going to play games. Regardless of which dictionary definition you chose to post. Where I come from wanting something is not the same as needing it. I think I'll have to stop discussion on this thread too...

What you propose is called the Gap Theory it was first proposed by a Scottish theologian named Thomas Chalmers. The word 'replenish' in the KJV is what most people point to for support of this theory. The problem comes from tanslation. The Hebrew word used in Genesis 1:28 is translated...

No minced words just a little jibe in jest. You see the point I am making DV. I have answered that question so many times that I tire of it. You choose not to accept my answer and I choose not to accept yours. I will state it one more time just for clarification and then perhaps we can...

I think your starting to catch on:) Claiming and being are very different.

I never said he NEEDS our worship. Wanting something and needing it are two very different things.

Please explain how you reconcile that with the Bible.

I see nothing wrong with having Christian symbols or sayings on your car. If you do, you have a responsibility to set a good example. Of course we have that responsibility anyway, just not enough people take it seriously.

They can work together DV. I understand your point DV, but I don't think you understand mine. Sorry can't just turn it off:) But I'll try not to let it show so much.

haha...I don't think you like the answer to it myself:) The answer is obvious to anyone that can read and think for themselves and you know it DV. It is most assuredly not moot. It proves my point. The 'christians' that did those things were not following Christ's teachings.

Absolutely not! Of course I can only answer for myself:)

Whether it was what you asked or not the answer remains the same. It definitely without question fostered a relationship with his chosen people. They were reasonable because due to God's grace the jews were still able to attain the ultimate goal of living with God forever. Taken as a...

I definitely never disputed the fact that they did those terrible things. You didn't answered my question. Were the bombings and snipings that Eon spoke of in accordance with the teachings of Christ?

So are you saying they are an extinct monkey (or ape)? I can live with that. Some of them probably were. That doesn't change anything to do with this thread though...

Why wouldn't an omnimax being want a relationship with his creation? Not sure what the OT problem is that you are referring to here DV. The law provided a way for them to ask forgiveness and God gave it. The OT jews that asked forgiveness in God prescribed way are in heaven. They attained...

Perhaps my yes answer was too hasty. We can attain the goal. We work toward it during our time here on earth. We get closer and closer and closer so we make constant progress. And eventually we do attain the goal. It happens when we are taken away to heaven. Our goal is to be as...

Obviously where we differ DV and Eon for that matter, is what we consider a Christian. Or better yet what we consider Christs teachings to be. Obviously the terrorists you speak of Eon were not following Christs teachings. Would you agree?