Search results

I'm Augustine, too, apparently. Btw, I think it's quite a fitting description of you, Kidan.

I'm not going to enter this debate. Jango, I guess you're relatively new to this forum, so I'll just let you know one thing -- abortion topics should be left alone (on all). They become tediously long, very heated, and no one ever changes their minds. Don't take me the wrong way -- I'm not...

You've posted quite a few times today. In the time it took you to make these posts, you could have posted a single post of value, showing him this "context error".

Don't compare yourself to Einstein. That makes me laugh.

I understand that, but you must still let your arguments speak for themselves. I surely hope you're not trying to imply that you're right just because you've studied it more than he has. That's just stupid. Luckily, I don't think you are. I think you're just stating a fact. That's fine, but...

That's it. Belittle your opponent and pump yourself (an appeal to self-authority?). Wow, suddenly all your arguments make sense! *sigh* And don't bring age into it. That's just pathetic. More pathetic.

*sigh* Whatever, buddy. Dating puts it right into the time frame in which it was discovered. Carbon dating is not as "fallible" as you would have others believe. I swear, it's like you guys think scientists are engaged in a trans-generation, worldwide anti-Christian conspiracy. Ridiculous.

The shroud is not old enough to be Jesus'.

Crap, you're right Drelin. Sorry! BTW, can I have an autographed copy of your book?

Which, as Drelin said, we know from...the Bible. This is circular reasoning, attempting to prove the Gospels with the Gospels. Since that didn't seem to be sarcasm, I'll tell you. Your arguments, basically your entire belief system, has as its foudnation the gospels. The fact that these gospels...

You're assuming it's accurate. It *may* be geographically and even historically accurate (though many of the events, such as Herod's slaughter of the children, are recorded only by the Gospel writers), but that does not make them infallible. The fact is, miracles must be taken on faith due to...

Wow, Eon. Simply incredible, my freind. Guys, he makes an awesome point. Now, as an atheist, I view all the gods as farsical and fabricated -- you know this. I see articles like this as the pot calling the kettle black. And yet, when I look at the wide spectrum of gods that man has built up for...

No, Eon totally destroyed your logic. Let's not backpedal. Besides, if what you really mean by "it's all speculation" is "it is how it is, and that's it", then you've just bent over for the anthropic principle.

You're a joke. You keep asserting that I live by IG somehow. And, you're asking me to go through and pick apart a book? A website is one thing, but a book... let's just leave it at the fact that there is no contemporary evidence for the existence of the historical Jesus. As for me drawing truth...

Wow Mahfrot, why don't you just take the gloves off basically unprovoked, buddy? Oh wait, you just did. You want to see me defend my arguments with proof of fact from research I've done myself? I do it all the time. Linking to IG is often a lot easier than typing out lengthy explanations, etc...

hahah

Ugh, I can't stand the "liar, lunatic, or lord" argument..it creates such a false trichotomy. Also, Josh McDowell is worthless. I don't care that his work is mainly directed at teens, he could still form better arguments. "The Resurrection Factor", for example, is complete trash.

Corpfox is confusing the hell out of me.

Question, Master~Plan: Why do you believe in the miracles recorded in the Bible, which you must take soley on faith, but reject these faith healings, which you can watch with your own eyes?

There's no coincidence -- the antropic principle carries over once again, and that "nocturnal life" would not be there to be observed existing if the moon were not there. This is not very hard to understand! If you're playing poker and all the aces are removed from the deck, you're not going to...