Search results

  1. T

    Atlantis

    Just sell your soul to Satan, GM, on a hilltop during a full moon. Cut yourself a few times for good measure, too.
  2. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    What do you want, an apology? You should apologize -- I'm the one who considered sleeping with a bucket by my bed last night. No, but it gives the idea a much stronger support and backing than Creationism will ever have. The logic follows, the argument is strong, and the evidence is there to...
  3. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    Anayo, this argument seriously makes me want to puke my dinner. I had cheesy chicken quesadias, so that wouldn't be pretty. Evolution is not a religion. Evolution is based upon objective evidence, not faith. We have observed evolution: http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html Evolution...
  4. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    Dude, what IS your problem? I backed off of you, and then you reply to one of my remarks with an incredibly short "Watch it." Way to be an ass. Listen, if you're not good at debates, then A) don't enter them with me, and B) don't post remarks like that, thus incurring my wrath Just a final...
  5. T

    Atlantis

    Just a quick question...any Christians here believe in Atlantis? Thanks.
  6. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    Watch it? I eased up on you...you watch it, buddy. Why don't you actually jump into these discussions and try to defend your faith?
  7. T

    Evolution?

    *mutters something about irony* Anyways, well said, Eon.
  8. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    I've already addressed everything in your post, many times. This is becoming nauseatingly repetitive.
  9. T

    Evolution?

    No, it doesn't support your brand of creationism at all...it supports man's intellect and powers to create.
  10. T

    Evolution?

    http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/21438?fulltext=true (Bold Mine) I like how your site also goes on to try to show how natural selection somehow does not allow for speciation. *sigh*
  11. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    Very interesting -- do you happen to have a link? I'd love to read that. Very interesting point, and possibly a very valid one. Regarding the other messiahs, thats why I'm wondering if maybe Jesus is just a big combination of the many messiahs running around, you know? As for the Romans, while...
  12. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    I have a serious question -- do you know how widespread the gospels were at the time of their writing, which was, if I may remind you, at the very least 50 years after the supposed time of Jesus? Well, if they're Jewish, that kind of speaks for itself and denies him as the Messiah, doesn't it...
  13. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    Just a disclaimer: As I am heavily outnumbered, you're going to have to allow me a teensy bit of time to respond to so many posts directed towards me at one time Then please choose your words more carefully so I understand what you're saying. As for the expansion, I'm not too sure. Our...
  14. T

    Evolution?

    CCGR, they were unnatural in that those scientists originally thought that one of the components present in their soup would also have been present in primitive earth's soup (which is what they were trying to replicate). They later learned that early earth's soup would not have this component...
  15. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    Well, thanks for the question, Tasty. If Jesus existed, then he was one of many people in those days claiming to be the messiah...I'm sure you agree with me there, correct? Perhaps he could even perform magic, like the Egyptian magicians of Exodus, or prophesize like the false prophets spoken of...
  16. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    When did I claim it all to be a hoax? Yes, I acknowledge its existence. I do not acknowledge its divine inspiration, inerrancy, infallibility, or otherwise. Oh no? Please think about how much that makes sense, and if you still think it does by the time you post again, I'll post some obvious...
  17. T

    Evolution?

    Presumably, the first organisms. Having never really seen this does not eliminate the possibility. It has been shown that life from non-life is very probable in conditions similar to what the early earth would have been like. Furthermore, scientists were able to create a virus from scratch. No...
  18. T

    Evolution?

    Indeed
  19. T

    scientists try to explain buring bush, parted sea

    OK, fine, another example. The epic of Gilgamesh was written in cuneiform in 2000 B.C. Cave drawings on walls are also older than the sophisticated hebrew writing of the dead sea scrolls. But regardless, this is simply argumentum ad antiquitatum -- arguing that because something is old, it must...
  20. T

    Evolution?

    Whitestone, speciation has occured. http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html Complete with citations at the end. Enjoy. Dependant on another organism? Sure. Had life never evolved here on earth, earth still would have existed. Rock is rock, pretty much.
Back
Top