Search results

easy way to win bgs and get achievements tho

kek

3.2 raid laughable enough said :(

this is also a good point to remember...once you have the OS installed and all of your programs - do a full system backup. it images the box and you won't have to re-install programs again...

Those are interesting ideas (although I don't like the two specific instances you referenced because I just shudder at the thought of my spells doing AoE without my input ;) ). Perhaps part of why this isn't in place is the notion of "bring the player, not the class". While that behavior still...

what do you mean by this? CoE, imp scorch / WC / ISB / Misery are examples of talents that magnify other players damage. Good luck getting a lock to actually throw CoE up for you though :(

we had some issues mid raid last night w/ this...once people converted to BN accounts, they could log in just fine

you can create the character yourself to do this...don't need someone else to make it for you. i do it all the time :)

Geniuses at Mac stores are prohibited from having an IQ over 90. Trustory!

NO NO NO

it's on silverhand...

As an apparent fair weather main (or maybe fair weather vein would be better??) I can state that this conversation has taken place in the leadership forums and you will not, any time soon, see changes. Not sure what's up with people thinking it really takes countless hours to do well in this...

What "onboard"s are you asking if you can use at the same time? If you're asking about audio, which I assume you are...then I believe the ATI driver set has some components that allow the Realtek devices to channel their output through that HDMI out...should be able to google it (or BING it...

/agree !

raptors all the way until SSDs have less failure rates

For useful data - yes (although I'd go w/ more than 3) - for your OS and program files, not much value in it. There it's all about speed.

Let's see... 1 Disk: it fails, system down 2 Disks R0: one disk fails, system down i.e. they're equivalent. In both cases a single failure results in unavailability. Frankly, if you're *that* worried about your disks failing to the point where you're so vehemently against raid 0, I...

The support for them has nothing to do with their atrocious failure rates. They are, in fact, sketchy.

Uh - if you're running a single disk - you lose 1 drive, and your data goes bye bye too. They would if they had the I/O to support it :) True. Plus the quality of SSD drives is sketchy, at best, unless you're willing to shell out for an Intel drive, and those still have *some* issues...

i'd be curious as to why you have such a vehement reaction to this - a good portion of the time you're disk bound. for that matter, if you're only using a single disk then if it fails, it fails - you're in the same boat as you would be with raid 0. try running 1900x1200 and frapsing full...