Search results

DV- If you have rock solid evidence for the belief in the loch ness monster, then you are reasonable in believeing so. I don't have to believe in the loch ness monster, but I can still understand the concept of a belief based on rock solid evidence. (just as a pointless sidenote, a nhilist...

There are records that show that the cancer was cured... So that pretty much means its evidence to a lot more people than myself, like I mentioned earlier You think it should be in every scientific journal? Before I remember you were pushing the idea of 'freethinker'. A miracle is not possible...

cool, it fits my money budget, now if It only fit my time budget Id be set...

grats, now you just have to make a poll and we'll vote on the name :D

oh man, waht is the world comming to....

no they weren't. Keep in mind if they could have gotten out of thier horrendous death by denying thier claim. So if they were lying, then they died a horrible death, for no reason because if they were lying, they would know they would not be going to Heaven. This is simply insane. OR they were...

(^GP is kind of right, but I don't want to look like a cop out, so back to witnesses I guess?) of course it does, why would someone simply dieng for a cause make it right? Theres always 2 sides to any war. The whole point derrived of a nonbiased witness dieng is because even though it cost...

^what?! language? I didn't hear any language... heh, sorry

Moderator's Note: Had to clip this one due to inappropriate language. I like this one^

not really sure where your getting this from. I have shared my experiences with many people. I can't imagine someone seeing a man miraculously healed of cancer and not sharing it with anyone... No one over the internet because of obvious reasons, but its relevant to a lot more people than me...

:) "Fine" Anything. Witness an event with thier eyes, and die because they are so certain of what they saw, and will not deny it. In the case of Christianity it was 12 could you fill me in, I"m drawing a blank

The focus of this whole thread eludes you. This thread is about my views. I'm not trying to prove anything to you. It really doesn't matter what you think. You call my views unreasonable, and I share with you the Logic and evidence I have seen. Do you believe my views unreasonable? I have been...

You guys diverted. I'm talking about eye witnesses -not martyrs and thiests... ^Bill got it

how many eye witnesses have died because they would not deny the beast named Sasquatch? how many people have written books going in detail of Sasquatch? Or is it more like: " I saw a blur and a big footprint" Does Sasquatch have any historical record? Maybe someone saw a Gorilla out of habitat...

as may you... My evidence presented to you is anectdotal, but My evidence experienced by me is First Hand I have seen hospital test results of a man who had so much cancer that he was given 3 months to live. I also saw the follow up official hospital tests of two weeks later after a night...

thats not an assumption, would you like a source quote?

agree... this isn't a rational statement. a. God has been verified to me- that is I have first hand experience of God working in my life b. "the belief in such a bieng can not be founded by logic" is a gross blanket statement Do you claim complete knowledge? Are you the standard of logic...

no worries, its just New Mexico. If something goes wrong and it blows out of control, it'll only melt the desert sand dunes into glass dunes :rolleyes:

great site. If someone monopolizes on international press, it would be the most powerful weapon. The organization poses as those in favor of halting wars, but I think its meant more as another interface for manipulation than for communication integrity.

never winter nights?! don't tell me it took that long...