Search results

if a mod puts a thread back on track because it has scampered off onto some unrelated subject, fine, but if a topic is progressing fine still relating to the original topic, why should one of them be stopped for having an opposing opinion?

i think you misunderstood me........ we're supposed to give preference to Christians. in other words, they are to be treated with "preference" above non-christians... hence, i think it's wrong to, for example, automatically ban a christian for an undesired response but only give a...

"give preference to the brethren..." ---genesis, that last comment you made about being more lenient to non-Christians sort of frightened me. in my humble opinion...you're already doing to me what has appeared to happen to others here...i don't agree with everything that's going on here...

also... why is it so wrong for people to get into heated and spirited debate and discussion? if something doesn't burn down (ego,pride?), then good things cannot grow in its place.

it just appears to me that this forum sorta goes like this..... mod - "this personally offends me so i'm going to take it way too seriously and lock the thread" being a good moderator means being a moderator. -------mod·er·a·tor n. 1. One that moderates, as: 1. One...

these verses seem to be taken quite out of context and seemingly attempted to be applied to non-applicable subjects. it's just frustrating to see Christians unable to take criticism or advice from anyone but themselves. having an opinion, feeling strongly about it and discussin it...

i'm not exactly sure what point macattack was trying to make, but what i take from it is... 1. people are getting their feelings hurt over a post they don't like 2. only spiritual milk is encouraged here, because whenever any spiritual meat is offered it gets treated like arrogance...