A Catholics Problems with Ecumenicalism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Problems with Ecumenicalism

    Once I convince my Catholic Church that Paul was indeed the Antichrist, and that all our institutionalized Anti-Semitism sources out of Paul, then I can appeal to Judaism – offering Paul’s Head on a silver platter as a good faith gesture that The Church would graft itself again substantially into the Jewish roots it had wrongly abandoned.  

     Then it occurred to me.  There is nobody to negotiate with.  Judaism is an unorganized mess.  Each Rabbi is more or less in business for himself.  No one is in charge.  They have a State, but they have no King.  Every five minutes they throw out a government, or shoot a Prime Minister who is willing to negotiate for Peace, and then bring in a new PM for another five minutes.  Useless talking to them.
 
    I could try something suggested by Medjai – make a Jewish Catholic Pope.  People don’t know this, generally, but the Church already has an Ethnic Jewish Cardinal – Jewish on both sides of his family.  Get him to dance at a Bar Mitzvah and eat a Kosher Hot Dog and I could Convert thousands of ‘walk in’ Jews, but still, it would be just one at a time.  It isn’t like there is a big Jewish Organization that would come into The Church en masse.

   I had another idea – Plan B.  If I couldn’t find a Jewish Religious Leader, since they don’t have any, to be Pope, then I could use their Capital.  The idea of a  “Roman” Catholic Church always seemed silly to me.  A Universal Church would necessarily have to come from the Religious Capital of the World, which is, you guessed it – Jerusalem.  The Big J.  This would be the greatest surrender the ‘Roman’ Catholic Church could make, after de-canonizing its founding anti-Semite, Paul.  It would be bound to attract a mass Conversion of Jews.  But there would be a huge downside….

     I couldn’t touch Jerusalem unless the Moslems were already on board.   It is their City now.  Quite frankly, the Moslems are a better and more Religious and Righteous People than the Jews, and I would not want to alienate the Better People, the Moslems, in order to appease what is only a Historically important People whom The Church feels guilty for having once screwed over – the Jews – these Jews who spent the last 80-some generations totally degenerating into the depths of a moral and ethical Hell.  Yes we see a glimmer of decent life from them once in awhile, as for instance when a Jewish screen writer can force himself to remember how to make a  morally uplifting end of a Movie… but only after 90 minutes of shallow plot, puerile vulgarity and gratuitous violence, … but, on the whole, every negative anti-Semitic stereotype is, forgive the pun, right on the money.  But the Moslems, despite a Religion whose origins have ‘lying cheating rug salesman camel jockey swindle job’ written all over it,.. despite that, they are an amazingly righteous people – they believe in Brotherhood, love of neighbor, they’re zealous for community, they foreswear usury, pray like maniacs and do enough penance to kill a horse, and know more about Submission to God than 99.9% of even the best Catholics.  I would not sacrifice one Moslem to convert a million Jews.

     Don’t have much choice though.  I can see what the Catholic Church could offer the Jews.  But the Moslems have a solid Heresy that plugs every loophole for attempted conversion – Mohamed would be the “last and greatest prophet”.  I can’t see getting around that.  Now, they do have a soft spot in their hearts for Our Lady – they call Her ‘Miriam’.  And Our Lady seems to appreciate them.  Our Lady of Medjugorje, Bosnia, told Her Visionaries in town that the only ‘Saint’ in the area was a woman who turned out to be a Muslim.  Her Visionaries were surprised, even shocked, to hear such a thing, but Our Lady told them that “It is God who decides such Things”.

     And if we look back in History, we can see that God more or less kept things even between Christendom and Islam.  They won the Crusades, but we sunk their Fleet at Lepanto.   We never rode into Mecca, and they never rode into Paris.  Even.

     What I really need is for Our Lady to do something She has never done before – have a major Apparition before a Non-Catholic Crowd.  I need a “Our Lady of Palestine”.  Certainly, no People has served a greater penance than the Palestinians.  In blood and tears they have paid for a Divine Intervention, and I hope they get it.  Because, until the Muslims come on board, it would not be right for the Catholic Church to negotiate with the Jews.

     Speaking of Ecumenicalism – what about the Protestants.   Well, Paul is really the Apostle to the Protestants.  Every Schismatic Heresy was somehow tied into Paulian Doctrine somehow.   The Prots will not like it that their Doctrines would be so obviously renounced as deliberately Satanic, which is really the only legitimate excuse the Catholic Church could offer when they de-canonize the crap and throw it in the Vatican dumpster.  It would be perceived as a very hostile provocation.  But, realistically speaking, after 40 years of The Church making sincere Ecumenical gestures toward the Protestants, all their thousands of denominations have only dug their heals in deeper.  So, screw him.  Give the Devil his due.  We wouldn’t want Hell to go totally empty, now would we.  So Fill it with the Prots.  They will be ‘saved’ alright – ‘saved’ for when the charcoals are nice and white hot.
 
I really don't think hell is a pit of fire. I believe it's a holding cell that means total separation from God, and that is as painful as a thousand bonfires alit on my sweaty little palms.
But aside from that, WHY is Paul such a liar? You give me conjecture after conjecture, but no back-up! Please tell this hellbound Protestant why Paul is of the Devil, and life, she is good.
And I'll give you a bet that your lady never does appear, ever. I'll also give you a bet that if she does, it will be thanks to this awesome magic called laser graphics. They have this nice laser setup in New York on top of a Catholic or New Age church (which, I forget), that is capable of a several-mile beam that could be used to project an image (as that of your lady) to anyone within visual range of the sky. Purty interesting.
But then again, to suggest the lady needs lasers to appear is probably anti-Catholic.

And I think you'll have a big task on your hand of convincing the Catholic Church as a whole that Paul is of the Antichrist, mainly because Paul never said anything anti-God, really, except in his zealous for God days.
 
Ultima, the visions of Mary date back way *way* before any such laser projections. Now, why are you willing to bet she never appears? This is why I posted that thread about Catholic miracles - how do Protestants so easily toss aside their Catholic counterparts' claims to miracles? I notice you even said "your lady". So, you admit that these miracles belong to Catholicism, and were they to be true, they would validate Catholicism (and, consequently, invaldiate Protestantism). Now, please tell me why you believe that these visions, which are really no different than the miracles in the Bible which you so readily believe in, must never have happened.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Ultima Avatar @ Oct. 12 2003,8:56)]I really don't think hell is a pit of fire. I believe it's a holding cell that means total separation from God, and that is as painful as a thousand bonfires alit on my sweaty little palms.
But aside from that, WHY is Paul such a liar? You give me conjecture after conjecture, but no back-up! Please tell this hellbound Protestant why Paul is of the Devil, and life, she is good.
And I'll give you a bet that your lady never does appear, ever. I'll also give you a bet that if she does, it will be thanks to this awesome magic called laser graphics. They have this nice laser setup in New York on top of a Catholic or New Age church (which, I forget), that is capable of a several-mile beam that could be used to project an image (as that of your lady) to anyone within visual range of the sky. Purty interesting.
But then again, to suggest the lady needs lasers to appear is probably anti-Catholic.

And I think you'll have a big task on your hand of convincing the Catholic Church as a whole that Paul is of the Antichrist, mainly because Paul never said anything anti-God, really, except in his zealous for God days.
Dear Ultima,

The mistake everyone makes in contemplating Hell is to think that a Loving God is in charge of the Place. Well, no. God is in 'charge' of Heaven. He has Providential Influence through His Angels on Earth, but Hell has been delivered over exclusively to Satan.

But, remember, the reason everyone is in Hell to begin with is because they present the real threat of Rebellion. If they could rebel against God, then certainly it may occur to them to rebel against Satan. So Satan is put in the position of being a paranoid Dictator who must establish an absolute authority and permanent Reign of Terror. And Satan can't have any Souls 'executed' -- they are eternal and he is stuck with dealing with them. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Sadam Hussein -- all those Souls who had proved in their lifetimes that they knew how to overthrow authority and take over for themselves, Satan would have to protect himself from.

So he binds them in chains and tortures the rebellious spirit out of them. God certainly isn't protecting him. If Satan can't stay on top of it, then some other gastly Demon can rule Hell.


Why is Paul such a liar.

I have a paper in 10,000 words itemizing it. Let it suffice to say that Paul's doctrines of State Supremacy, Predestination, Salvation by Faith Alone, and Subjectivity of the Eurcharist are diametrically opposed to the Teachings directly from Christ about The Kingdom of Heaven, Free Will, Salvation through Penance of Suffering, and the Real Body and Blood in the Sacrament. The New Testament, between the Gospels and the Letters of Paul present two distinct sets of Doctrines, and the Church needs to choose. You say that Paul never said anything Anti-god. Well, he dismisses Righteousness and let's People retain their Individuality -- this is Satanic. Yes, all his lip-service is for how wonderful God is, but the whole time he is fostering a rebellion that keep people from ever really attaining to God. Look at the Church of Paul -- the Protestant Churches -- they really don't have a Spiritual Clue. Everything Paul teaches chases them away from any true Mystical Surrender to God, Penance, Mortification. He teaches only that people are saved by repeating an easy little magical formula. The Serpeant in the Garden told Eve that eating the Fruit would make her Free. the Serpeant wasn't so indiscreet as to say it was maneuvering against the Will of God, but lead Eve to beleive that God would be pleased. Paul says that repeating a magic formula would Save people. He said that God would be pleased. Some things are just lies.

As for Our Lady never appearing. You need to do a few Web Searches. Our Lady of Guadalupe, Our Lady of Grace, ...Rue de Bac, La Salette, Pontmain, Knock Ireland, ... Of All Nations, ....Lourdes, ...Garabandal Spain, ....Medjugorje, ....Beauraing and Banneaux Belgaim, Rosa Mystica of Montichari Italy. There is a website with a lot of links http://www.apparitions.org/#codes
it would be difficult to dismiss all of that by saying that people were using Laser Light Shows before lasers were invented.
 
Except you cannot prove what you find on every website. There are billions and most of them are full of garbage.

Cory
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Thaddius @ Oct. 12 2003,9:44)]Except you cannot prove what you find on every website. There are billions and most of them are full of garbage.

Cory
And you cannot prove the accounts in the Bible, yet you live your life around it. Are you beginning to see my point? You cannot simply dismiss these claimed miracles - you cannot.
 
Oh my. I did not mean to imply Mary had never appeared. I meant to apply I would bet your Palestinian apparition wouldn't happen, and felt like mentioning the laser projection in passing (b/c, that would serve as an awesome tool for projecting the IMAGE of the Beast (not to say your lady is)).
But I don't know, and I can't invalidate Catholicism (which would NOT necessarily validate OR invalidate Protestantism) nor is that my purpose.

The mistake you seem to have made Leo, is thinking that Satan has some kind of eternal power. Read Isaiah's early prophecy regarding this: Satan will be lower than low. He will be in the same pit as everyone else: in separation. He will have no power. It's like Satan's castration and unmanning: being cast into the second death with all who followed him, apart from God, forever, and irreconcilable. He can't torture them. And it's not torture, either. A loving God, as we so like to flaunt God about as, would not institute some manner of torture. Hell is not the rack. Hell is just the isolation chamber. Forever. And Satan, he's in the same pit as all who join him. He has NO power in eternity, at all, except to contemplate on his foolhardiness forever. Which, I think, is what the real torment of hell will be.

Now as to visions of Mary. We have paintings. We have pictures. We have ideas of what she looks like: white and bright and robed and serene and thin. You get enough people to look at this, and remember them every Mass, then pretty soon, when life sucks, or doesn't suck, people can point up to the clouds and see they see that certain shape that everyone else sees: mass hallucination, over and over again.
Maybe not all the time, but definitely some of the time, these apparitions have been most likely mass hallucinations.
However, I will not discount Catholic miracles. Why? B/c Protestants and Catholics alike serve Christ, and Christ is almighty. Protestants and Catholics just hate each other, so they like to discredit one another. But Christ could care less about our petty arguments, except frown deeply on us and punish us for our girlish squabbling. Miracles happen alike. Why should I disprove a Catholic (Christian) miracle apart from a Protestant (Christian) miracle?
 
Ultima, your explanation for Mary sightings is terrible. If most of these sightings were mass hallucinations, why are you so quick to believe that Jesus was seen after his ressurection, rather than mass hallucinations? You are inconsistent in your beliefs.

Furthermore, validating Catholicism in areas such as the veneration of Mary *would* atleast partiall invalidate Protestantism, as it would give credit to tradition and begin to divide authority between it and the Bible. Same goes with literal transubstantiation - 100% invalidates consubstantiation, now doesn't it? This is why these miracles must be examined by Protestants.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Thaddius @ Oct. 12 2003,8:44)]Except you cannot prove what you find on every website.  There are billions and most of them are full of garbage.

Cory
Dear Thaddius,

So you can't prove what you read on every website -- well Rome was not built in a day. You look around and see if there are more than one website -- more than one organization saying the same thing, which cancels out mere profiteering on a narrow interest. Then you see if other organizations lend their support and credence. Books will have Forewards by the most reputable scholars in their field, but if not, you may have a problem.

But in regards to many of the Catholic Miracles, the proofs are ongoing. Our Lady typically leaves Shrines in Her wake. Shrines are always a source of fresh Miracles. There are often Shrines at the Graves of Saints. If you ever need a Miracle, just pray to the Grave of a Saint. Saints typically have more power dead than alive. America has few enough Saints. There is a quaint little Shrine in Brownsville Texas that I remember. The Mexican's swear by it.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Ultima Avatar @ Oct. 12 2003,9:44)]Oh my. I did not mean to imply Mary had never appeared. I meant to apply I would bet your Palestinian apparition wouldn't happen, and felt like mentioning the laser projection in passing (b/c, that would serve as an awesome tool for projecting the IMAGE of the Beast (not to say your lady is)).
But I don't know, and I can't invalidate Catholicism (which would NOT necessarily validate OR invalidate Protestantism) nor is that my purpose.

The mistake you seem to have made Leo, is thinking that Satan has some kind of eternal power. Read Isaiah's early prophecy regarding this: Satan will be lower than low. He will be in the same pit as everyone else: in separation. He will have no power. It's like Satan's castration and unmanning: being cast into the second death with all who followed him, apart from God, forever, and irreconcilable. He can't torture them. And it's not torture, either. A loving God, as we so like to flaunt God about as, would not institute some manner of torture. Hell is not the rack. Hell is just the isolation chamber. Forever. And Satan, he's in the same pit as all who join him. He has NO power in eternity, at all, except to contemplate on his foolhardiness forever. Which, I think, is what the real torment of hell will be.

Now as to visions of Mary. We have paintings. We have pictures. We have ideas of what she looks like: white and bright and robed and serene and thin. You get enough people to look at this, and remember them every Mass, then pretty soon, when life sucks, or doesn't suck, people can point up to the clouds and see they see that certain shape that everyone else sees: mass hallucination, over and over again.
Maybe not all the time, but definitely some of the time, these apparitions have been most likely mass hallucinations.
However, I will not discount Catholic miracles. Why? B/c Protestants and Catholics alike serve Christ, and Christ is almighty. Protestants and Catholics just hate each other, so they like to discredit one another. But Christ could care less about our petty arguments, except frown deeply on us and punish us for our girlish squabbling. Miracles happen alike. Why should I disprove a Catholic (Christian) miracle apart from a Protestant (Christian) miracle?
No, I don't believe that Satan has a special Eternal Power, but he is eternal, and he was there first. Hell is like earth. God does not send Angels into Hell to run the place. Its like a big garbage can. God throws souls in there and forget them. But Satan is the fattest maggot because he has been there the longest. Satan has set up a hierrarchy of frightened demons to maintain a tentative order. Like Hitler or Stalin, how does one explain how one free being will do the will of other free beings. Well, actually I can explain. There is a power in discipline and these people realize it. Any time any man could get only ten other men to absolutely obey them in absolute loyalty -- that is the power of an Army. Because the power of this nucleus becomes so frightening but at the same time the power of it so obviously lucrative that it sucks in more and more. the power of these organizations is as strong as the discipline and loyalty of the nucleus. For instance, someone begins to waver and tells his best friend that he is thinking of getting out of the organization or plot against it -- now, in a strong Organization the Best Friend would immediately report the incipient betrayal to the Leader. That is the kind of Organization Stalin ran. If you were in that Organization then you were isolated in an absolute loyalty -- if you even blinked disloyally you would be taken out and shot. But, wow, talk about having your every order obeyed enthusiastically and to the letter! Well, that is what Satan is running in Hell.

Also, you can quote Isaiah about Satan. Some of this Reduction of Satan may indeed be prophecy -- that has not been fulfilled yet. We all know about the Book of Job where it was evident that Satan was given the Power to tempt Job. Satan also tempted Christ, without really knowing who he was dealing with. Also, its been said that Satan demanded one Century to Test Christ's Church, and was given the 20th Century. It was said that all the demons were unleashed from hell in order to exercise their evil influences over the mind of men. 20th Century Moral and Political history would tend to bear that out. But, look at the Calendar. Satan's Century is up. You Prots will have to consolidate your gains... you will no longer have the help of Satan or some demon whispering in people's ears to help you out.
 
Dear Utima,

You don't know what a Marian Apparition is. You have been lead to believe by the Mass Media that a Marian Apparition is when someone says a Potato Chip looks like Mary. No. A Marian Apparition often goes on for years, appearing to often times a number of seers or Visionaries.

That Website that you complain about because you can't believe it anyway. Well, at least go to a few links so you know what we are talking about. Its just ridiculous when you come to the table refuting Mary Potato Chips when we are talking on a whole different rung.
 
funny that you are so fast to toss paul out when he was the Jew of Jews he knew more about what Jesus was talking about than any of the other Apostles because he knew the letter of the law and everything, next thing we know you will be tossing out Jesus as the messiah and say it was truely marry who it was so that you do not offend your orthodox jewish friends
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]If you ever need a Miracle, just pray to the Grave of a Saint. Saints typically have more power dead than alive.

Sorry, I only pray to God, through Jesus Christ. I do not worship past believers. But by all means, you keep on if you feel that will get you to heaven.

Cory
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (timor @ Oct. 12 2003,8:08)]
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Thaddius @ Oct. 12 2003,9:44)]Except you cannot prove what you find on every website.  There are billions and most of them are full of garbage.

Cory
And you cannot prove the accounts in the Bible, yet you live your life around it. Are you beginning to see my point? You cannot simply dismiss these claimed miracles - you cannot.
actually Timor, I can dismiss these alledged miracles. He does not believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God. He said so himself.

[b said:
Quote[/b] ] In regards the Bible. It was a reference material published by the Catholic Church in the 4th Century. It was intended as a study guide. It was never intended to supplant Church Teachings that went directly back to Christ

Now, since he does not agree with what I base my faith on, I do not have to believe anything he says regardless. The same with mormons, jehovias witnesses, and any other cultest out there who distorts what the Bible clearly states to justify their own means. I would almost bet that most Catholics would look at this guy as a nutjob for wanting to discount half the New Covenant as being a fraud. Paul never claimed to be a prophet, yet this Leo guy has. You tell me based on Scripture which one should be considered an antichrist.

Cory
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Thaddius @ Oct. 13 2003,11:55)]
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]If you ever need a Miracle, just pray to the Grave of a Saint.  Saints typically have more power dead than alive.

Sorry, I only pray to God, through Jesus Christ.  I do not worship past believers.  But by all means, you keep on if you feel that will get you to heaven.

Cory
One word can sum that up and that word is pride.
All power that we have is given by God. We by ourselves have no power. But in the name of Yeshua and with his anointing I can do many things. But without those I am nothing.
 
Lion, take some breathers, you've been reduced to rambling.

Cory, the miracles stand independant of Leo. Leo did not fabricate these miracles in his mind, Leo did not perform them, and Leo is not the only one who believes in them - rather, almost all Catholics worldwide (or in your terminology, "true" Catholics) stand with him and believe in them. As for the Bible, the Bible repeatedly stands behind miracles, so no help for you there. It seems to me that you as much as you'd love to ignore them, you can't yet come up with a valid reason to. Then again, that's what ignorance is.
 
Your right Timor, I am ignorant to the stuff that is brought here about these miracles. I know zilch about these sightings of suposed Mary.  Do I believe them? Of course not.  Jesus did not send His mortal mother to be his messenger.  He brought the message and He will return to reclaim His people.  Can I verify if these were true or not?  nope.  Do I care to?  nope.  As for the comparative to the miracles in the Bible, I believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God.  My faith is what lets me believe that they really happened.  Regardless, I do not need proof to believe what the Bible tells me.  I do need proof for what the Catholic church tells me. 1500+ years of corruption tends to do that.  The Catholic church has been plagued with scandels, murder, destruction, you name it in the name of God since it was romanized.

I personally believe that the spiritual antichrist will be a pope.  He will be the one to defile the temple and claim to be Christ.  Heck even Leo's wacko theory of a jewish pope falls within that.  If God wants me to believe that Mary is what these miracles claim she is, then I'll have to see it for myself.  Until then, I'll go on believing the Bible is right, he is wrong and not much he tries to back up is going to change my faith.

Cory
 
Now that, Cory, was a much better, more more thought out post. I'm not going to respond anymore to it at the moment, as I have things to attend to, and I don't really feel like sparking anymore arguments.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (timor @ Oct. 13 2003,3:18)]Now that, Cory, was a much better, more more thought out post. I'm not going to respond anymore to it at the moment, as I have things to attend to, and I don't really feel like sparking anymore arguments.
lol....thanks
tounge.gif


Cory
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (LionOfJudah @ Oct. 13 2003,10:41)]funny that you are so fast to toss paul out when he was the Jew of Jews he knew more about what Jesus was talking about than any of the other Apostles because he knew the letter of the law and everything, next thing we know you will be tossing out Jesus as the messiah and say it was truely marry who it was so that you do not offend your orthodox jewish friends
Dear Lyin of Judah,

Why don't you read Paul and then think about what you write. Yes, Paul was ethnically Jewish, but all that ended when he began his attack on the Jewish Law early in his Religious career, and the attack never let up. In his later letters his insults against the jews become gratuitious and openly Anti-semitic. Now, why? Well, the Jews were a merchant people. The Greeks were a merchant people. Hmmmm. Maybe Paul was feeding on a rivalry. Certainly his Doctrine of Easy Salvation appealed to the Something for Nothing Greek Mentality.

You need to understand what Paul was up against. In those days the Jews were proselytizing much as the Christians were, and thousands of people were converting to Judaism. But they had to be sincere. They had to submit to the Law and be righteous. So lazy and insincere people shied away from it. Paul saw this huge population of the Lazy and Insincere as an untapped Market that he could appeal to. And he appealed to them with a Salvation Without Effort Doctrine -- while he discreditted his rivals with what would become good ol fashioned Antisemitism -- his creation.

And you defend him.

Read it. Don't just think that you have read it before. Read it again -- and not in The King James -- you can hardly understand modern scholastic english let alone that arcaic and convoluted language of a half a millenia ago. Now, The King James serves more to hide the true meaning than to ellucidate it. But even if that is all you have -- paying attention might help. You should try it.
 
Back
Top