Dark Virtue
New Member
Didasko said:I didn't notice anyone saying that you believe in macro evolution as the 'be all end all' DV. Where did I miss that?
It's been implied in more than one thread, as well as a lack of distinction between micro and macro evolution.
As for macro evolution being more scientific than creationism...gotta disagree with you there. After decades of searching...there is no evidence for macro. So being that there is no more scientific evidence for macro than creationism...how can it be more scientific? I remember you saying at some time in the past that believing in something that there is no evidence for takes faith.
Science doesn't pretend to be able to answer all the questions RIGHT NOW. How long did it take us to discover Pluto? You ask how it can be scientific when I have already given you the answer. You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. You don't believe in macro evolution because there is a LACK OF EVIDENCE to support it. Macro evolution has been tested by the scientific method and has been found wanting. The difference is that it IS testable and verifiable. Creationism is neither. THAT is the difference. You use science to disprove evolution, but support a theory that can't be tested by science.
I agree that creationism should not be taught in the science class. It should be in ancient history
I agree! Alongside all the other myths that humanity has grown out of.
There are people searching archeological digs to find evidence that what the Bible says is true. That is as scientific as searching layers and strata for evidence of macro evolution.
I wouldn't hold your breath. If archaeology supports a city that was mentioned in the bible, does that mean the ENTIRE bible is true? NOPE. Now when archaeology discovers the Noah's ark, The Garden of Eden or something equally significant, then we can talk.
I have nothing against science guys. I love science and used to teach it. But trying to force the teaching of a theory with no scientific evidence supporting it into public education science curriculum from K-12 is suspect at best.
AGREED! That goes for ID, Creationism AND Macro evolution.