OBJECTION!
<Music Change Tempo Up> <Cut to shot of Phoenix Wright banging desk>
Your honour this point is central to 80% of our discussions on this board. By being able to shy away from defining what a 'True' Christian is, the prosecution is able to weasel out of just about any argument by claiming that whoever was involved in a verifiably documented instance of behaviour that supports my clients case is not a True Christian!
I move that the Prosecution no longer be able to make that claim - unless they can prove to the courts satisfaction what a True Christian actually is!
In addition I would like to see the following arguments banned:
1. Self referential use of scripture.
2. Statute of limitations on behaviour.
3. God works in mysterious ways as any sort of definitive answer to anything
I think that until the Prosecution is forced to actually make a stand on these issues, they will continue to run around the matter.
<Music Change Tempo Up> <Cut to shot of Phoenix Wright banging desk>
Your honour this point is central to 80% of our discussions on this board. By being able to shy away from defining what a 'True' Christian is, the prosecution is able to weasel out of just about any argument by claiming that whoever was involved in a verifiably documented instance of behaviour that supports my clients case is not a True Christian!
I move that the Prosecution no longer be able to make that claim - unless they can prove to the courts satisfaction what a True Christian actually is!
In addition I would like to see the following arguments banned:
1. Self referential use of scripture.
2. Statute of limitations on behaviour.
3. God works in mysterious ways as any sort of definitive answer to anything
I think that until the Prosecution is forced to actually make a stand on these issues, they will continue to run around the matter.