Big changes and big zerg buffs in next patch!

Mostly_Harmless

Mostly_Harmless

Tribe of Judah Unreal Tournament Chapter Co-leader
Since the release of Wings of Liberty, the StarCraft II balance team has been diligently studying how the game is being played, playing it ourselves, and seeing how evenly the three races match up on the battlefield. While we regularly examine Battle.net player data and statistics from all regions, the information we're examining in this blog was pulled exclusively from the North American region for simplicity's sake.

Protoss are played 38.5% of the time.

Terran are played 38.0% of the time.

Zerg are played 23.5% of the time.

These are overall percentages, but they're mirrored in nearly the same exact separation through each of the leagues. This clearly shows that zerg are played less often than the other races. When we look at things like the Top 200 we like to have this data in-hand so we can ensure that it's proportionate to the amount of each race actually being played. We don't want to have a huge chunk of zerg players sitting somewhere further down unable to rise through the ranks.

Let's take a look at win percentages on a race-versus-race basis. This is something else we look at to see how matchups are faring over many games. These numbers take individual player skill into account, which helps to avoid the 50% win/loss percentage effect that the matchmaking system can impart on straight win/loss ratios.

Win % in Diamond (accounting for player skill)

49.6% win rate for Protoss when fighting Terran.

52.8% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.

49.6% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.



Win % in Platinum (accounting for player skill)

56.3% win rate for Protoss when fighting Terran.

47.3% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.

44.5% win for Terran when fighting Zerg.



Win % in Gold (accounting for player skill)

61.0% win rate for Protoss when fighting Terran.

61.1% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.

49.5% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.



Win % in Silver (accounting for player skill)

63.6% win rate for Protoss when fighting Terran.

50.7% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.

51.6% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.



Win % in Bronze (accounting for player skill)

59.0% win rate for Protoss when fighting Terran.

55.1% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.

45.4% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.

As you can see there are some issues with Protoss vs. Terran in many of the leagues. From our own play experience, as well as feedback from the community, this matches pretty closely with what we're already aware of. We're working on solutions. What we're also aware of is that while the numbers don't necessarily support the need for zerg changes across all leagues, the feedback from the community as well as our own play experience tells us that improvements are necessary to make zerg matchups feel and play better.

The balance changes in our next patch will primarily focus on improving the zerg.

Here are a few of the changes we currently have planned:

· We're increasing roach range. This will allow roaches to be more effective in large groups, giving the zerg more options in the mid to end game.

· Fungal Growth will now prevent Blink, which will give zerg a way to stop endlessly Blinking stalkers which can be very challenging to deal with in large numbers.

· The Barracks are going to require a Supply Depot, which will impact a lot of early terran reaper pushes.

· The reaper speed upgrade will require the Factory, which is meant to weaken a lot of the early terran reaper attacks that dominate so many matches, especially in team games.

· We're making a number of increases to the health of zerg buildings, which will make the very vulnerable zerg technology structures more resistant to raids. We don’t expect these hit point changes to have a super significant impact on the game, but the current numbers felt way too low.

We want our avid and talented StarCraft II players to know that we're here, we're listening, and that our intent is to continue making careful and measured approaches to balance based on community and fansite feedback, our numbers and data, watching pro players and tournaments, and our own time on Battle.net playing the game alongside you
 
For the most part, I'm okay with these changes. I don't know how i feel about the roach range. Man those things pwn marines like there's no tommorow, and this would totally make reapers worhtless as they WILL NOT be able to out micro them. I'd really appretiate it if the maurader got a -1 range nerf and the marine got a 1+ range buff. Why make the factory require speed upgrade for reaper!? why not just make the upgrade take a little longer? I do agree that the reaper did need an additional nerf due to ridiculous OP of a terran repaer and ling cheese in 2's. It litterally could not be stopped. I think fungal growth is a little too strong. Think about brood wars for a second. Remember how the queen did ensnare and the defiler did plauge? Fungal growth is a combo of those 2 abilities. I have played a few matches against Naruto and he rushed infestors and mass fungal growthed my balls. Now even though he did lose the games, I was rather shocked at how much damage he did to my army by taking out more than 80% of my men even though he had hardly any attacking units at all. I think the damage and spread is good enough, but I think fungal growth shouldn't KILL any of the units like how plague worked. Now depeneding on the units armor, I think fungal growth should leave 1 hp of life for however much armor is upgraded. I do feel that unit's should be able to move VERY slowly while under fungal growth like queen ensnare. Fungal Growth plus baneling is impossible for bio balls to stop. What I was hopeful for in a new patch was to make zerg base and queen macro management a lot easier for zerg. Zerg Units are frickin deadly in combat and I fear fighting a skilled zerg user more than any other race. Well naruto, I know your happy right now :p
 
Mostly_Harmless said:
· The Barracks are going to require a Supply Depot, which will impact a lot of early terran reaper pushes.

· The reaper speed upgrade will require the Factory, which is meant to weaken a lot of the early terran reaper attacks that dominate so many matches, especially in team games.
Click to expand...
And cue Terran player RAEG...

...NOW.

I think a less severe change would have been to require a supply depot before building a barracks add-on rather than the barracks itself. Blizzard's change nerfs reapers, but it also increases the effectiveness of ling rushes against Terran players.

And I think requiring the factory for the reaper speed upgrade is a bit silly. Just increase the research time. Coupled with a supply depot dependency on the tech lab and reactor and that would nerf reaper rushes without crippling reaper in the early game.
 
Are Reapers even used mid to late game? Every video I've watched has them being used for early harassing but nothing else so what are the good for now?
 
Reaper/barracks changes are absurd. Reapers aren't that strong, and terran is disadvantaged if they go for early reaper and it doesn't do enough damage. They're now completely useless. The rest of the changes are probably good/okay.
 
yeah, I'm kindof iffy on the necessity of the supply depot before barracks thing.

Heh, poor, poor reapers. :D
 
Reapers get nerfed into oblivion as roaches get buffed back from oblivion.

Funny how it all works out.

EDIT: Okay, okay, maybe saying that roaches were stationed out in "oblivion" is hyperbole, but a range boost does make them more appealing now.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top