xavier55
New Member
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was a nice, succinct and accurate definition and explanation - very helpful - thanks.
Evil does not 'exist' per say, as it is not an entity. Evil is an action with malicious intent, every bit as much as Love is an action with benevolent intent. When it is said men commit evil acts, they are deemed evil for not following God, who is goodQ. What are the arguments against God in relation with evil and suffering?
* If God is good, evil cannot exist, but evil is the fact of life, therefore God does not exist.
God created man in His image, as moral agents working under a Moral Government, His Government.* If God is all good and all powerful, then God should prevent evil. but evil still exists. Therefore, God is either not all good or not all powerful, but both cannot be true.
Many things can be 'inferred' when one speaks of evil.Q. Are these arguments really against God?
* When one speak of evil, what is inferred? Who gives the standard of good and evil? What is just and unjust? Without universal, divine standard, we call it ‘law’, how can we answer the question of evil?
The answer is a resounding NO!Q. Can God use evil to do good?
I ask you, was it ever the Lord's intention that Joseph was sold into slavery and imprisoned?* Joseph in old testament is a great example of God using evil for the greater good (Genesis 50:20).
* Jesus’ death on the cross is ultimate example of God using evil for the greatest good for the mankind.
* God has offered a final triumph over evil and suffering of this world through death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
* Romans 8:28 – “And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.”
Is this an official postion?Zeena,
Thank you for your comments. I'm not clear what you mean by 'denomination-specific' doctrine. Calvinism and Arminianism are theological systems more than denominational. I'm not trying to be picky here - just as you are not trying to be contentious. I didn't take your comments that way. I do want to respond to your notion of limiting what can be posted in the Bible Study thread.
The Bible is the Bible and Bible study needs to include the full Bible - the good the bad and the ugly. That is why we have a Bible study thread on the forum. It would be a pretty bland forum if every comment were welcomed by every Christian. You have been on the forums long enough to see that there are Christians who are easily offended - even by statements about salvation or love or angels or peace - pick the positive topic of your choice. Even the pure, noble, and lovely topics are controversial for some people.
Theology is the process of collecting scriptures about God and different aspects of His kingdom. Once you start collecting scripture there is generally some bias attached - even in the verses you decide to select. There is merit in the statements posted by xavier55 and merit in the posting you made, as well. There are also things in your AND xavier55's posting that I might not agree with. Because I disagree, that doesn't mean you are wrong or you should not post.
The problem comes when people posting become so dogmatic that another opinion cannot be expressed. There are things Christians should be dogmatic about - i.e. the Bible is God's word - Jesus is the Son of God - man is sinful - Jesus paid the price for our sins - no one comes to the Father but by Jesus - Jesus is coming again - and a few more. There are also things we should not be so dogmatic about - when Jesus is coming again - where heaven and hell are located -what is the proper way to manage a church - which is the best English version of the Bible - how God works all things together for good - who will be the greatest in heaven - again, pick your contoversial issue.
These are the issues it is fun to discuss and educational to see what others think and why. I wouldn't want to have a Bible study forum that specifically said you cannot bring up controversial or difficult issues. That is how I have grown through the years. Bumping up against views and opinions that were different from mine made me re-explore the Bible to know where I stand.
I don't visit a lot of other forums - I just don't have the time. One of the strengths of the Christian Gamers Alliance forums is that there are threads for serious Christian discussion and prayer, threads for fun Gamers stuff, and threads for Alliance business and fellowship. I appreciate the variety and diversity in our forum. And anyone can pick which threads they want to follow. I hope it will stay that way.
Zeena said:The answer is a resounding NO!xavier55 said:Q. Can God use evil to do good?
If the Allmighty requires ANYTHING in order to do good, then He is not Allmighty!
Can He, yes, but does He, no.
For He is not capable of evil actions [malicious intent].
He refuses to act unrighteously.
Rather, He brings light out of darkness.
He works all things together for good to those that love Him!
Zeena said:I ask you, was it ever the Lord's intention that Joseph was sold into slavery and imprisoned?xavier55 said:* Joseph in old testament is a great example of God using evil for the greater good (Genesis 50:20).
* Jesus’ death on the cross is ultimate example of God using evil for the greatest good for the mankind.
* God has offered a final triumph over evil and suffering of this world through death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
* Romans 8:28 – “And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.”
Was it ever the Lord's intention that His Only Begotten Son should suffer as He did on the cross?
If the Father were on earth, would He have crucified His very own Son?
I answer, NO, it can never be!
Zeena said:Acts 2:23
Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
God allowed Jesus to suffer at the hands of wicked men, percieving the consequences.
If Jesus was never crucified, things would have been EVEN better off for us than they are now, believe it or not!
Zeena said:I can post on anything I want as long as it's Biblically sound in my eyes, even if not considered 'orthodox'?