Did you choose to read this article?

john3610

New Member
Did you choose to read this article?: Thoughts on God's Sovereignty vs. Free-will

by Michael Ramsden

The issue of free-will and predestination is one that has raised its head in every generation of Christians. Do we exercise choice, or has everything already been decided? The resultant mental gymnastics leave many feeling confused, and others feeling disappointed. Did you choose to read this article, or has God already determined that you will... or won't? Maybe if you get halfway through, put down the article, and then pick it up again, you might think that you have double-bluffed God. Yet we know that nothing takes Him by surprise. On the other hand, Christians throughout the ages reject the kind of fatalism that is seen in some parts of the world.

The problem with the question as it is presented is that it is not nearly difficult enough. In order to truly appreciate the magnitude of what we are discussing, we must first deal with an even greater question. And it is this: Imagine if I were able to stop time right now. What would you be thinking? What would you be feeling? The answer is nothing.

In the absence of time, we cannot think or feel or do. Everything is frozen. People sometimes complain that I speak too quickly--the problem being that there is not sufficient time for them to think about what has been said. I always try to cheer myself by saying that at least something has been said for them to think about! But it is a fair criticism because in the absence of sufficient time we cannot think things through. In the absence of time altogether, however, we cannot even begin to think, as there is literally no time to think in.

We live and have our existence in a space-time continuum. We "belong to eternity stranded in time," observes Michael Card.(1) This also means that before God created there was no time. Time is not co-eternal with God. But we also know that God was a thinking, feeling, doing Being even before He created. Can you imagine a Being who is able to think in the absence of time? Of course not, but the God we worship not only exists outside of time, He can think and act in the absence of time.

Just reading about this is enough to make us feel overwhelmed. And so it should. Whenever we think about the person of God, we should rightly feel that we have come across something truly awesome. And maybe this is part of the problem. We are not faced with a logical contradiction here. Rather, we are faced with the reality of what it means for God to exist, for God to be God. You and I are only able to think in time, and thus, God confronts us with choice: "Choose this day whom you will serve," "choose life" and so on (Joshua 24:15; Deuteronomy 30:19). But God, outside of time, sees all of history stretched out before Him. The problem comes, therefore, when we confine the God we worship within time. But this needn't be the case. A proper understanding of the tension drives us back both to God's divine nature and to our knees, acknowledging how wonderful He is.

This understanding also helps us with the issue of eternal life. Many people find the idea of eternity frightening. What will we be doing for all of that time? Once again, our dilemma arises because we are captive both to the passage of time and too small a view of who God actually is. People also then ask: if God truly knows all things, then why did He create knowing that we would experience pain in a fallen world? But we know that God did not create the world and then think of a plan to rescue it. In the book of Revelation, we are told that the Lamb was slain before the foundations of the world were laid. This does not mean that the crucifixion took place in our space-time history before creation (there was no space-history for it to take place in). What it does mean is that even before God created, God also knew the price it would cost Him--the suffering of his own Son--to redeem his creation and save us. God didn't count that cost too great--and hence we sing of God's amazing grace.

Let me conclude with the following. People who assert that everything comes down to choice and that the future is full of possibilities believe that they have a basis for hope, but acknowledge that the future is unknown. The French existentialists were famous for this, and miserable because of it. For all their desire for hope, when their open future was realized, it always disappointed. In this sense, hope becomes wishful thinking when it has no secure future. On the other hand, fatalists believe they have a future, but no hope. Nothing is or can be done, for all has been determined.

But on the contrary, God is big enough to be able to say, "I know the plans I have for you... plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future" (Jeremiah 29:11). There is no hope without a secure future, and the future is frightening in the absence of hope. Only God is big enough to bring these two things together--hope and a future--and this is what He has done for us.
 
You never cease to amaze me. Follow your calling no matter what others may say. Twelve men followed theirs, giving up the temporary for the eternal. The world has not been the same since they made their choice to follow their call.
 
haha! If I had the mind to think and communicate thoughts like Michael Ramsden who wrote that article I'd certainly be doing that kind of apologetic work!
 
freewill

thank you Bil for this article.

First off let me say, I LOVE apologetics. I have an English degree but i took a lot of philosophy courses in college, so i love to mull things over.

Given the fact that God exists outside of time, He knows everything, but i still believe we have a free will.. the ability to choose right and wrong, good and evil.

God knows the end result no matter WHAT we choose. So i believe yes we chose to read the article.. but GOD knew that we would read it long before the world even existed because he is outside of time.

I am NOT a Calvanist so i dont believe that there are a certain number of people that were predestined to be saved.
I believe that God had plan to SAVE ALL of humanity, but it is still our choice to respond to that saving grace.
OUR choice to reject his plan of salvation. Even though God KNOWS our choice.
He knows that we will be in Heaven based on our free will to choose his plan of salvation. (accept it or reject it).

anyway.. my answer is short and not very deep just wanted to respond.. God bless u guys.
 
I understand desire to try to reconcile free will and God's sovereignty if you are committed to the need of those two concepts co-existing. Yet ultimately is free will or the concept of preserving free will truly God's focus?

One of the things I see rarely questioned is what lies beyond the question of why did God allow evil and pain into the world, which seems to only often focus on the man-centered reasons. I am not saying the question is invalid but the conclusion only seems to center around the why for mankind.

The whole universe was created for God's glory - what if evil and pain were allowed into this world to show the glory and perfection of God? To demonstrate His perfect justice and absolute sovereignty? What if the answer isn't about man's purpose, but rather about God's ultimate glory?

I don't think that these are easy questions to answer but I certainly think that the Scripture gives the answers if one digs hard enough.

I am fascinated by this topic (not free will, but the sovereignty of God), and how the core of the article which asks questions outside of space and time, and into the inner sanctuary of God.
 
Even though this topic has nothing to do with bacon.... it reminds me of Luther's book the "Bondage of the Will". For whatever side of the free will vs. sovereignty you fall on I highly recommend this book. Here is an excerpt.

You describe the power of "free-will" as small, and wholly ineffective apart from the grace of God. Agreed? Now then, I ask you: If God's grace is wanting, if it is taken away from that small power, what can it do? It is ineffective, you say, and can do nothing good. So it will not do what God or His grace wills. Why? Because we have now taken God's grace away from it, and what the grace of God does not do is not good. Hence it follows that "free-will" without God's grace is not free at all, but is the permanent prisoner and bondslave of evil, since it cannot turn itself to good. This being so, I give you full permission to enlarge the power of "free-will" as much as you like; make it angelic, make it divine, if you can! - but when you add this doleful postscript, that it is ineffective apart from God's grace, straightway you rob it of all its power.
-Luther
 
I like the discussion of free will vs. God's sovereignty. The reason I like it is because it stretches my mind. It makes me think and question and I like that a lot. And the best part about it is that you don't have to think one way or the other to be able to spend eternity with God. I'm sure we are just brushing the surface of understanding, but whatever you believe about you choosing God or God choosing you (personally I lean more towards the tenants of calvinism and my being chosen, but I also think that true Calvinism believes both free will and predestination are true as I do) doesn't much matter. There are smart men and women on both sides all who tenderly adore our God and King.

I believe that both are equally true (which is different than a lot of people)... we have free will and God has also predestined us. I know it seems like a contradiction, but I don't believe it is at all. I've heard the argument that we have to have free will because without free will there is no such thing as love. For instance, if you program your computer screen saver to say "I love you" you don't actually feel warm fuzzies from that because you programmed it to say that. It's the same way with God. If he programmed us to say "I love you" that is not worship, at least not by it's true definition. So I do believe we have free will because without it we cannot love God truly.

But I also believe that God has chosen me. He picked me out. So how does that work? How can I have free will and still be chosen by God? If I was chosen wasn't it already decided what I'd do? I was thinking about this one night while reading my Bible and I wrote down my thoughts in my notes:

"The natural response of the newborn is to immediately draw his first breath, it is involuntary and instinctive. In the same way, the natural response to the glory of God is praise: to fall to your knees, to cry out his majesty and to worship with abandon the God who is worthy of all praise."

It isn't like God is bending your will to His own. He isn't tricking you or messing with your mind. When you burn your hand on the stovetop you pull away. When you step off a diving board you plunge into the water below. When the God of the universe confronts you and shows himself you fall on your knees and worship Him. It isn't coercion. It is the natural order of how things happen.
 
Last edited:
The Lord is not slow concerning His promise, as some count slowness, but is long-suffering toward us, not purposing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. 2Pe 3:9 NKJV

Realizing that this is only one scripture and does not constitute a complete line of thought, I believe God would have every person who has been created to come to a proper relationship with Him.

I do not think there is an argument here, but a free expression of one's personal understanding. I appreciate all of the input for my mind is so very limited. The consideration of different ideas is what helps us to grow intellectually - which is to the glory of God!
 
Notice the "us" in
but is long-suffering toward us, not purposing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
The scope of "all" is qualified by the "us". The repentance here is not every person created but every one of "us" which is referring to "God's people".

God is not willing that any of "His elect" should perish.
John 6:39
39 This is the will of Him who sent Me: that I should lose none of those He has given Me but should raise them up on the last day.

And of course God's will is not thwarted, all of His people will come to repentance. These verses will be fulfilled.
 
Last edited:
Notice the "us" in The scope of "all" is qualified by the "us". The repentance here is not every person created but every one of "us" which is referring to "God's people".

God is not willing that any of "His elect" should perish.


And of course God's will is not thwarted, all of His people will come to repentance. These verses will be fulfilled.

Problem with this thinking my friend is your translation of the Greek....

NIV- Translates it much differently. I must pull out the old greek UBS text to see what my ancient schooling tells me.

Here is Ewok's prefered version-

2 Peter 3:9 (English Standard Version)

9 The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.

Just saying...
 
I see harmony in those two translations. It doesn't refute what Ewok is saying.

God is patient toward you (the believer(s)), not wishing that any (believers) should perish, but that all (believers) should reach repentance.
 
I do love the ESV and feel it is an accurate version.
I do not see any difference between the NIV, ESV, and NKJV in regards to this passage. Just as Lloren pointed out, they are all speaking the same way and I believe the Greek will testify to that, as I referenced greek tools in regards to my answer.
 
Last edited:
This is a classic example of English being a poor language.

Does all mean everyone (as I think it does) or all Christians only (as others think).

My personal belief from my own study is that Christ Jesus' sacrifice on the cross was powerful enough for anyone who believes this is there is no limit on what it's power can accomplish.
 
I'm definitely not the most versed in the Bible but to my understanding for both to be true..that we are chosen but it is also our free will....God knows everything so therefore he knows in the end who are going to be believers so in that sense he knows who will be with Him in the end and who won't. We don't know that...we are not aware of who those elect are...so it is our job as it is commanded of us to go out and be fishers of men and not sit around thinking nothing we do will change the already predestined. At least that is somewhat my understanding...correct me if I am wrong.
 
You are spot-on there! If we love God we will obey His commands, especially the most important one of the Great Commission. Sitting around on the couch and thinking that everything is predetermined is called "Hyper-Calvinism" and is a very bad thing and not a Biblical response to the doctrines of Grace.
 
I've always heard this quote:

We should live like armenianists, but sleep like calvinists.

Translation: we should live day to day and share our faith with everyone we meet. But at the end of the day should realize it is in God's hands.
 
I am not arguing with Bill here - I think we ought to share the Gospel and depend on God to bring the results.

I only want to state that I don't personally think that Arminian theology is representative of superior Gospel witnessing while Calvinism is more about trusting in God's sovereignty.

What I am getting at is I have seen neglect from whatever side of Christendom regarding the need to be a faithful witness, and manipulation to get results.

I am a strong adherent to the doctrines of grace (aka Calvinism) but all of us must agree that the Bible is authoritative and infallible - whatever it says is true and whatever we are called to do we must obey.

The Bible says share the Gospel - so we must
The Bible says God will bring about salvation - so we trust
The Bible says God's ways are higher - we are but dust
 
Last edited:
Back
Top