Shagz
New Member
Take Two blaming moders for "Hot Coffee" incident
One thing I found interesting from the article was the quote from the ESRB saying it was calling "on the computer and video game industry to proactively protect their games from illegal modifications by third parties, particularly when they serve to undermine the accuracy of the rating" of the original game.
Where does that put Epic/Digital Extremes, id and Valve? Epic/DE actually *rewarded* players for modifying the content of their games with a game license and cold cash. I wonder what the ESRB would have to say about that.
On the other hand, he does raise a point. I remember way way back, with Wolfenstien 3D, a game that would probably be rated M today, you could get an editing tool that would allow you to replace the wall tile graphics with whatever you had handy, resulting in a number of mods of "questionable" content. And there's countless skins for games that leave little to the imagination.
If you're a parent, your kid gets an M-rated or less game, but then downloads a mod that contains Adults-only rated material. Who's responsibility is it to police that kind of thing? ESRBs? The game developer? The publisher? Parents? *Should* it be policed? In doing so, you might kill the mod community. Well, not kill it, but certainly ruin the "fun" (and by "fun" I mean the whole sense of innovation and artistic expression that comes from having no limits)
Thoughts?
One thing I found interesting from the article was the quote from the ESRB saying it was calling "on the computer and video game industry to proactively protect their games from illegal modifications by third parties, particularly when they serve to undermine the accuracy of the rating" of the original game.
Where does that put Epic/Digital Extremes, id and Valve? Epic/DE actually *rewarded* players for modifying the content of their games with a game license and cold cash. I wonder what the ESRB would have to say about that.
On the other hand, he does raise a point. I remember way way back, with Wolfenstien 3D, a game that would probably be rated M today, you could get an editing tool that would allow you to replace the wall tile graphics with whatever you had handy, resulting in a number of mods of "questionable" content. And there's countless skins for games that leave little to the imagination.
If you're a parent, your kid gets an M-rated or less game, but then downloads a mod that contains Adults-only rated material. Who's responsibility is it to police that kind of thing? ESRBs? The game developer? The publisher? Parents? *Should* it be policed? In doing so, you might kill the mod community. Well, not kill it, but certainly ruin the "fun" (and by "fun" I mean the whole sense of innovation and artistic expression that comes from having no limits)
Thoughts?