Google takes on renewable energy

even though more people have died from solar panels than they have nuclear facilities >.>
 
ok, I've gotta ask for a source on that one. Other than construction accidents, I don't see how anyone would die from solar panels.
 
it was useless fact of the day.com and it was because they died from installation.
 
alright, that's what I figured, but other than being a statistical anomoly, it's a rather poor reason to not do something :)

As for Google trying to find cheaper ways to do the same business, and reduce their carbon footprint, I can't say I blame them. Obviously, as the article stated, they want to increase profits and find a cost-effective source of energy that makes it worth the effort to switch
 
already did that when i was walking on campus saying women shouldt be in positions of power like president >.> but thats a different story that involved me quickly hopping onto a bus...
 
Back
Top