Two new Officers! Huzzah!

[toj.cc]WildBillKickoff

[toj.cc]WildBillKickoff

New Member
I'd like to formally introduce to everyone the two newest officers in SoE/SOE-- Tony, aka Ash Slayton (et al) and Dave, aka Lady Cordelia Anne (et al).

Tony will be an officer in SoE. He is an effective spiritual leader and counselor, and brings leadership experience with him. Dave will be an officer in SOE. He is always looking for people to help and takes great pride in doing so, and is no Scriptual midget, either.

Please congratulate our two newest officers in-game or on the forums.
 
Is that really the additude we want to be portraying to the guild. One that our guild goal should be to "bug" and "annoy" our officers?

Just wondering if that is the healthiest or even most Christlike additude?

Rho
 
Thank you all.
You know if you need anything at all, just holler, whether it be advice, in-game help, prayer, or just someone to bug ;)

~tony

PS...and Congrats Dave...

Bill---A good choice Dave is...

lol, kinda sounded like Yoda there I did
 
Last edited:
Thanks everyone!

I am excited to serve in this ministry with everyone as an officer. And like Ash (whom I congratulate!) don't be afraid to contact me for whatever reason, I will do all that I can.

Thanks again!
Dave
 
If the officers didnt get bugged every often they would loose sight of what we are trying to obtain. Also without the occasional senseless stuipidity they would get bored and start to act stuipid themselves. By this strange reality we are better able to harness our officers into mean thinking machines.
 
Praise God, Two new officer! God deffinitely provides. Thank you two so much for putting your time and effort into helping this guild God BLESS YOU!!!
 
What?!?!? Did anyone understand what Vibro just said? Can anyone other than Vibro translate that for me?

Rho
 
Manyik said:
What?!?!? Did anyone understand what Vibro just said? Can anyone other than Vibro translate that for me?
Click to expand...

vibrokatana said:
If the officers didnt get bugged every often they would loose sight of what we are trying to obtain. Also without the occasional senseless stuipidity they would get bored and start to act stuipid themselves. By this strange reality we are better able to harness our officers into mean thinking machines.
Click to expand...

I think what Vibro is saying is that by bugging the officers it keeps the officers sharp, (i.e. strengthening through trials). Otherwise if we were not faced with adversity we would become complacent and less effective. However, I'm not really sure "what we are trying to obtain is" in this context. Perhaps it's like an officer training excercise?!

Anyways, this is not my opinion, just trying to translating!
 
Because they are new officers in different fields, it is annappropriate to conclude that you can describe either both of them or all of the officers together into one subject. By leaving the subject of which we want to obtain empty, we allow the end reader to fill in his or her appropriate response that better describes what we are trying to obtain.
 
vibrokatana said:
Because they are new officers in different fields, it is annappropriate to conclude that you can describe either both of them or all of the officers together into one subject. By leaving the subject of which we want to obtain empty, we allow the end reader to fill in his or her appropriate response that better describes what we are trying to obtain.
Click to expand...

Since each officer individual officer cannot be included in a single generic subject, one can conclude that only through different methods of communication can an officer actually know or be known by that which they were called. One can conclude this to be equal in the members of each particular guild also. Therefore the reader could also assume that in order to provide the officer, as well as the members the best help possible, that any response can not only make them a better person through their own knowledge of their most inner self and how they would respond to such activities, but reveal to everyone the fruits which they bear and how to infuse personalities appropriately.

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

What???
 
but you must not forget that through this inferment of knowledge several distinct characteristics have been left unsaid. This is in part due because you are not that person and can never be that person, therefor there will be certain things you will never know about that person or what they do. Only by fellowshiping with that person will you get to know them best, for by fellowship you attain a true level of understanding and friendship. By this process you can expand apon what you can accomplish, have a reliable friend to fall apon, and grasp God better then if you were to attempt on your own. Only by fellowship can you truely know each other and God.
 
vibrokatana said:
but you must not forget that through this inferment of knowledge several distinct characteristics have been left unsaid. This is in part due because you are not that person and can never be that person, therefor there will be certain things you will never know about that person or what they do. Only by fellowshiping with that person will you get to know them best, for by fellowship you attain a true level of understanding and friendship. By this process you can expand apon what you can accomplish, have a reliable friend to fall apon, and grasp God better then if you were to attempt on your own. Only by fellowship can you truely know each other and God.
Click to expand...

I do not think him is who you think him is.
 
While your verbiage is very verbose I think your message is lost. Suffice to say that the idea of subjecting leaders to trial intentionally by those whom they have been called to lead is not a biblical or Christlike response from those are being led, and will ultimately only lead to those who have been called ignoring the call. While these particular men have responded to the call others will likely be less inclined to do so if they can except to get intentionally subjected to trials. Just a thought.

Also fellowship is not "bug" and "annoy" it is come together and enjoy each others company. The terms you have used imply that while you may be enjoying it the other person most likely will not be.

Rho
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top