Dark Virtue
New Member
Did you read the article I posted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Byblos, read the article. It states the arguement much better than we are doing, and we're already debunking yours.[b said:Quote[/b] (ByblosHex @ Sep. 27 2004,10:00)]Dark Virtue it isnt a myth its true. If it were false then women would be taking this into court, but they dont because they like it how it is. If they really wanted to grab an m-16 and blow away the enemy they would be fighting for it in court.
Dark Virtue, if women are allowed they will be drafted by the law.
Its not an assumption its true. Our soldiers kill for good not murder and still there are way less women willing to kill then men, we ARE NOT THE SAME! First look at violent games like unreal, sure girls play but arent 80% or more players male? How is this so?
WHy wont they fight for the country, because they dont want to and they shouldnt have to, CCGR said she would fight if they came to her house but she would rather leave it to the men.
Men are built for fighting, women are built for everything else... Look in prison how many women are there for murder compared to men? Look at hte military how many women are there compared to men? Its not a myth its how it is and how its going to stay.
[b said:Quote[/b] ]The reality is that there is absolutely no intelligent, logical, sensible reason for women not to be in combat roles with the technological style of warfare that abounds today.
There are political, patriarchal, religious, and misogynistically stupid reasons to preclude women but they all belong in The Museum of Natural Idiocy next to chastity belts, urban legends, homophobia, promise creepers, senile senators, proselytizing preachers, and military machismo. The antiquated concepts that fill the closed minds of the "brotherhood of the sword", - the military establishment - with its tailhook mentality and its martenetistic attitude - have created a brain-lock that has polluted everything from the Congress to the media. "
As a US veteran and Having many of my Female family member serve in the Army. I tend to think woman should not be on the front line, or in front line combat. Two reasons I have for this. I served for 6 year in the US Cavalry A male dominate combat arms unit. I spent the last 7 years a triage sergeant picking up eyes.[b said:Quote[/b] (ByblosHex @ Sep. 23 2004,1:50)]Only respond if you understand what I am saying completely, if anything I say sounds absurd you are most likely misinterpreting my English....
DO you agree with this Factual Rule of the USA Army.
Women cannot serve as Infanty or front-line soldiers, as they are more prone to worse things then death. NOw some people can say thats sexist, but I belive its protecting them from what they may not understand until it is too late. I belive women have every right to serve in our military, but they can be as just as helpful as a pilot or medic. Now it is true that women are on average more accurate shooters, however they die more easily and arnt physcially constructed for combat as a man. I know a woman could be as succesful a soldier as a man, but in my opinion the risk isnt worth it. The enemy will do much worse to our women then our men and would most likely avoid killing them for these reasons. Some of you may call me sexist for thinking women should be protected, but they do not know the danger until it is too late. So, tell me what you think of these ARMY rules? and how would you feel if they were removed and women were fighting on the front line!?