[b said:Quote[/b] ]Why is it that several posters have admitted that men are not like Christ, though they may try to be. Ergo, as a result, woman are still mistreated through this system.
Unforutnatley, I'm not quite sure what you are referring to, but I'll take a guess. As Christians, we strive to become more and more Christ-like. Our desire is to do the right thing, but often times, we fall short. Sometimes our fleshly desires (selfishness, pride, etc.) take over. If we are stepping outside of God's boundaries, then yes...actually we both (men and women) will get hurt.
I define a 2nd class citizen a bit differently. Your Monarch scenario is interesting, but I'm not sure it's totally hitting the mark. The problem is, the Monarch you are talking about is most likely making decisions out of complete selfishness and what is best for himself/herself. It's not really based on what the 'subjects' want.
On the other hand, take a king/queen who listens to their subjects. They take their feelings into account when making descisions. Sure, sometimes they may go against what their 'subjects' want, but the 'subjects' are ok with that because they have grown to respect their leader and know they make wise decisions. There is a big difference between the two monarchs and a big difference between the relation between citizens and leader.
Regarding your husband/wife/child thing...If a husband and wife are not going to agree on disciplining, they should not have children. It will wreak havoc on the child and on the marriage. Like I said earlier, husband and wife should be in agreement as much as possible.
Let's take your 2nd situation. Mom says go to your room and dad says sit on the couch. My take is, the dad should not have said anything. You just don't lay down your authority just to lay it down. It becomes very confusing to the child. They don't know if what they did was wrong or if they can just get away with stuff. If the husband disagrees with what his wife says, he should take her aside (not in front of the kids) and discuss it. If it happened the opposite way, then the wife should take her husband aside and openly discuss the situation. In either case, they talk it over and possibly come to a closer conclusion.
[b said:Quote[/b] ]When one has authority over another, that person is at a higher level of 'citizenship' and as such those under that person are second-class citizens in relationship to him.
I disagree. But this can be one of those cases where our upbringing has dictated our view on authority. I won't deny what you think on this, but here is my take. Someone who has authority over me is no greater or less of a citizen. We are equal. It's just one of us has more responsibilities. Do you feel a 2nd-class citizen to a policeman? I don't. They have the same life issues we all deal with. They pay taxes. Pay rent/mortgage. Perhaps the President has higher citizenship, I don't know...but I respect that choice because of their position and even that doesn't make me feel like a 2nd class citizen.
My current manager is fantastic and the reason is, I feel he comes down to our level. He doesn't laud his manager title, but he makes us all feel as equals, except that he is responsible for a lot more. Likewise, with my VP.